I know I’ve written plenty about the question of whether people can change as well as whether we would want Martin or Louisa to change very much. Well, I want to add a little more to this topic. (It seems I never tire of revisiting this theme.)
in a NYTimes Mag from a month ago I read an article about a BBC America show called “Orphan Black.” I haven’t seen the show, and plan to watch it, but the show sounds like it’s an amazing tour de force for the lead actress, Canadian Tatiana Maslany. The show is about a group (greater than 6) of persecuted clones all played by Maslany. According to the article, “The question at the show’s heart is whether the clones have free will…” Maslany considers her role in “Orphan Black” and her own experiences as an actress to be “about volition and autonomy.”
Maslany mentions that she appreciates Gena Rowland’s performance as a strong female character in “A Woman Under the Influence” (1974). In this film Rowland plays Mabel, who struggles to handle life as expected but just can’t pull it off. Ultimately she’s sent to an asylum to be “cured.” However, when she returns, her husband is troubled by how she has been forced to conform to society’s norms and blames himself. He literally tries to slap her back to herself; he wants her to be herself again. As Maslany states: “He can’t handle the fact that she’s been sent away to be changed and to be made homogeneous and made easy on the palate.”
What all of the above says to me is that there are two parts to this change issue: how actors can alter their appearance and their skills so that they morph themselves into all sorts of characters, even within the same show or episode; and, there have been many examples of shows or films that are fascinated with the idea of whether people can change. In Mabel’s case, she gets stuck in a no-man’s land of being an outcast when she’s behaving as she does naturally while also not being accepted in her new guise of conforming to conventional social norms.
As the writer of the article notes, “Great acting is as much about destruction-selective, temporary self-annihilation – as creation.” At the same time, Maslany asserts that when she portrays an unlikable character, she is still being her real self and applying the worst bits of herself. Actors enjoy playing characters that require them to molt and become “Other,” yet they understand that they really can’t completely shed their innate selves.
Furthermore, a recent interview of Joseph Gordon Levitt by David Letterman showed them agreeing that acting is basically like lying because actors get up and pretend to be someone else for a living. We all can suspend our disbelief sufficiently to allow each actor to take on various roles and apply his/her skills coupled with his/her personal traits to create a screen personality. In real life, it may be harder to reach that level of acceptability.
As in the case of Mabel, we believe Martin and Louisa should change; however, we don’t want them to be too easy on the palate. As I argued a long time ago, deciding to change involves the notion of free will with volition an integral part of that. Of their own free will, Martin and Louisa hopefully will do what they can to evolve into a more successful couple.
When we consider what it will take for Louisa and Martin to work on making changes such that they can have a happier marriage, we are watching two actors whom we’ve come to know as the characters in a show and who have used their skills as well as their true personas to create that pseudo-reality. Neither member of this couple will be sent to an asylum, but Martin, like Mabel, does not conform to social expectations. In S7, we are hoping to watch them change identities, but only enough so that we aren’t troubled by it.
Originally posted 2016-05-22 14:48:41.